| Like the film itself, the titular
twenty-seven dresses offer nothing overly special, yet it
is rather hard to discredit the product as a whole. 27 Dresses
is an amusing chick flick from the writer who penned The Devil
Wears Prada. What 27 Dresses lacks in substance, it more than
makes up for in humor and fiery dialogue. Best of all is Katherine
Heigl, who shines here just like she did last summer in Knocked
Up, completing the transition from television to movie star.
Always a bridesmaid and never a bride, Jane has collectively
helped twenty-seven of her close friends tie the not, dreaming
of the day when she can marry her attractive and successful
boss, George (Ed Burns). When her European trotting, blonde
sister Tess (Malin Akerman) comes back into town, that dream
is quickly shattered. Sweeping George off his feet, he and
Tess plan a hurried wedding which Jane begrudgingly helps
to coordinate. Discovering Jane’s obsession with weddings,
and her unusual romantic triangle, reporter Kevin (James Marsden)
devises a plan to expose the perpetual bridesmaid to land
himself a front page story.
There are a handful of characters in 27 Dresses and unfortunately
this over abundance leads to a problem for this film. Most
characters lack strong development, specifically Kevin (James
Marsden). While Kevin is a cynical, divorced man, there is
little more to build his character arc on. The good news is
that Kevin is an engaging and occasionally charming character.
Several scenes that feature Kevin and Jane together are enjoyable,
in particular the when the duo sing and dance with a barroom
full of drunks to Elton John. As for Jane’s sister and
boss, both are on screen for a moderate amount of time but
never receive enough detail to really give a greater depth
to their individual characters.
Director Anne Fletcher (Step Up), a former dance choreographer,
does nothing extraordinary visually but she also does not
get in the way of Heigl and the principle cast. This serves
as both a good and bad thing. Fletcher employs little visual
sense, telling the story as by the numbers as possible. This
makes for some bland scenes that don’t exactly pop off
the screen. However, she also lets the cast play off one another
quite well, even if the chemistry is not always consistent
between the romantic leads.
Some of the film is edited rather awkwardly, disrupting the
pacing and rhythm of the movie. There are several scenes that
should have hit the cutting room floor and found their way
into the deleted scenes feature on the DVD. Also, the last
third of the film comes off rather trite, forcing one last
cheap gag down audiences’ throats, leaving audiences
on a sour note.
While the story is not exactly enthralling, 27 Dresses turned
out to be quite entertaining thanks to Heigl’s presence.
The predictable rom-com formula is indeed present, but Heigl
has done a remarkable job of keeping the film from falling
apart at the seams. While many of the males in the audience
will not care less about how many dresses Jane has, she remains
likable and human enough to keep viewers engaged.
-G Brandon Hill |