| Perhaps Doomsday
was a bad movie to start with. It had all the trimmings
of one. With its campy, post apocalyptic story, the
genre film was already a target of studio scrutiny.
When Neil Marshall showed Universal his disjointed director’s
cut the studio probably hit the panic button. The solution,
gut the film so that it fits a running time of under
a hundred minutes. The result is a product that can
cram a large audience into theaters over opening weekend,
but what they will ultimately find is one of the worst
movies of this, or any year.
When an epidemic virus spreads across Britain, decimating
the population, the government is forced to seal off
the hot zone, sacrificing thousands of civilians to
save millions. Nearly thirty years later the Reaper
virus appears again, but this time in central London.
With panic spreading throughout the masses, the government
sanctions an elite military strike force to search the
infected area for a cure. What lies waiting for the
team is a small population of survivors ruled by sheer
anarchy.
What made Neil Marshall’s last film, The Descent,
so engaging was not the claustrophobic fear or special
effects, but the exceptionally well told story. With
fantastic character development for its genre, combined
with an evenly paced plot, Doomsday pales in comparison
to its predecessor. Calling Doomsday schizophrenic is
an understatement. The film changes tone and styles
repeatedly throughout the picture’s relatively
short duration, never giving each moment time to develop.
Speaking of development, whoever chopped down the theatrical
release of Doomsday managed to dissect the film so that
it is literally an hour and forty minutes of pure action.
While this might sound like a sugar rush of fun for
action fiends, be warned, while Doomsday is a very good
looking film, with gritty and vibrant cinematography,
there is absolutely zero intensity in the events that
play out on screen.
So with high speed car chases, cannibals and heavily
armored knights all in the same movie, how could this
be? The simple reason is that Marshall’s film
never gives us any reason to care about the characters
on screen. As Major Sinclair, Rhona Mitra gives an extremely
monotone performance. Just because you’re playing
an uber bad ass does not mean inflection should be negated.
While the actress was quite striking visually in her
tight, black spandex, the rationale for her character’s
final decision is highly unmotivated.
Another important element that seems to have been ripped
out of this cut of the film was a love story shared
between the team’s doctor and the young girl that
hosts the cure, Cally. We see the medical practitioner
go to extreme lengths to protect Cally, however the
only inkling of a romantic connection between the two
comes when the love birds collide accidentally. Aside
from this brief shot that lasts for only a handful of
seconds, the audience is expected to believe in their
connection for the remainder of the film.
Despite the character and story flaws though, at least
the action and special effects play our well, right?
Wrong. While there are a few bits of fun gore sprinkled
lightly throughout the film, all other logistics are
thrown out the window. Why the survivors of the plague
have reverted to medieval weapons when army bases have
been left open, ripe for pillaging, is beyond rationale.
Why a high end Bentley cannot outrun a collection of
beat up, sloppy jalopies will also raise doubts. How
the very same car can go crashing through a bus, and
come out completely unscathed is even more unfathomable.
Whoever managed to piece together the action scenes
did an equally horrendous job. With little motivation
to cut from one shot to another, and breaking nearly
every editing rule in the book, the majority of the
violence is so poorly compiled it is difficult to watch.
To top it off, unmotivated camera moves, like snap zooms
and angles shot upside-down, quickly draw the viewer
out of the picture.
With two solid movies to his credit, one would like
to think that the filmmaker who brought Doomsday to
light is not the same director that created Dog Soldiers
and The Descent. While this action flick might never
have been a good movie, the obvious plot holes and horrendous
film editing scream of a motion picture that has panicked
studio finger prints all over it. One has to wonder
if this theatrical release really is Neil Marshall’s
definitive Doomsday, or like the Reaper virus, if the
director’s cut will be quarantined for good.
-Joe Russo
Click to read our EXCLUSIVE interview with Niel
Marshall!
|
While I think it is a nice series of homages, there ain't much going on in here. Great review. I liked it a little more than you, but hopefully there is a directors cut.