| The Incredible
Hulk is infinitely superior to 2003’s Hulk –
but unfortunately that wasn’t difficult to achieve.
Although the film has a surfeit of action and gargantuan
battle sequences (involving more devastation than Cloverfield),
Leterrier’s Hulk is little more than King Kong.
An insipid love story, predictable villains and jargon-drenched
palavers don’t help the mighty green giant from
becoming anything more than a typical superhero. At
least the attention to seriousness is comparable to
Christopher Nolan’s re-imagining of Batman.
Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) has accidentally unleashed
a gamma poisoning mutation within himself that causes
his body to transform into a hulking green monstrosity.
Unable to control the raging Hulk, which is summoned
by his anger, he hides away from the world in the crowded
favelas of Brazil. Bruce converses with a mysterious
Mr. Blue through an encrypted satellite connection,
in the hopes of learning the secret to removing the
contamination from his body.
Meanwhile, General Thaddeus Ross (William Hurt) diligently
scours the globe looking for the elusive Banner, who
he tricked into experimenting with the radiation for
use as a military weapon. The General’s daughter,
Betsy (Liv Tyler), is still in love with Bruce, but
he keeps his distance to prevent hurting her or causing
the deaths of innocent people. To help with the manhunt
is Russian professional tough guy Emil Blonsky (Tim
Roth), on loan from the Royal Marines. But after witnessing
Banner’s unbridled powers as The Hulk, Blonsky
desires such abnormal invincibility for himself –
leading to further freakish experimentations that will
unleash an abomination.
The opening title sequence for The Incredible Hulk
rapidly sums up the entire Hulk origin, thereby leaving
the brunt of the film to serve merely as an episode
of adventure. The General occasionally fills us in on
missing pieces of integral information, but for the
most part, this film could serve as both a remake and
a continuation (a retcon, in comic fandom) of Ang Lee’s
Hulk from 2003. Not having much to live up to, The Incredible
Hulk easily outperforms its predecessor, but not to
the point of undeniable success. In an age where comic
book movie adaptations are no longer once-a-year or
out of the ordinary, this latest attempt sadly feels
like a typical superhero movie. The special effects
are better, the editing is certainly more tolerable,
and the characters are handled with more sincerity and
seriousness, but the story is frightfully familiar and
rather un-involving.
Attempting to create reason behind unexplainable elements
such as The Hulk’s ability to keep his pants on
(which is both impossible and largely unnecessary),
the film temporarily forgets that it is still leaps
and bounds from being even slightly reasonable. It does
distract us with Cloverfield-rivaling destruction at
Culver University and New York City, and the Hulk-Abomination
fracases are magnificently constructed and shot. The
Hulk doesn’t defy gravity or fly around like Lee’s
original version, but occasionally his movements are
too light and graceful for his tree-stump figure.
Director Louis Letterier does succeed in making a darker,
more violent and more serious Hulk, and the references
to other Marvel creations, the expected cameos, and
explosive action remains. But despite crafting a better
Hulk, the story and overall entertainment value can’t
compete with the choice superior superhero movies that
demonstrate both creativity and heart – such as
Iron Man and Batman, which are more frequent than ever
before.
- Mike Massie
|
I would give it a 7 or 8. I think it is a solid summer film. Ed Norton is really good in it as is Tim Roth.
It can't compete with Iron Man or Batman Begins, but I do think it is one of the better comic book films out there.
Great review.